Skip to content
UVU REVIEW
Menu
  • Home
  • News
    • Campus Government
    • Events
    • Politics
    • Crime/Title IX
    • Business
  • Lifestyle
    • Health & Wellness
    • Valley Life
    • Wellness for Wolverines
    • Eating on Campus
    • Professors
    • Student Blog
  • Arts & Culture
    • Music
    • The Cultured Wolverine
  • Sports
    • Baseball
    • Basketball
      • Basketball
      • Basketball
    • Cross Country
      • Cross Country - Men's
      • Cross Country - Women's
    • Golf
      • Golf - Men's
      • Golf - Women's
    • Soccer
      • Soccer - Men's
      • Soccer - Women's
    • Track & Field
      • Track & Field - Men's
      • Track & Field - Women's
    • Wrestling
    • Wolverine Sports
  • Podcast
    • Wellness for Wolverines
    • The Cultured Wolverine
    • Wolverine Sports
    • Pro Talks
  • Youtube
    • Wolverine Weekly
    • We are Wolverines
    • Matchpoint
  • Games
    • Wordle
    • Crossword
    • Sudoku
    • Tetris
    • 2048
    • Flappy Bird

Search


About Us Advertise Contact Work For Us

Search UVU Review

About Us Advertise Contact Work For Us
SIGN UP LOG IN
Arts & Culture

“Bridgerton”: Positively anti-historical or just erasing history? 

By Amanda Hemmert
|
3 min read
Lady Danbury (Adjoa Andoh) and Simon (Regé-Jean Page) in Bridgerton. Photo courtesy of Shondaland and Netflix.
Apr 19, 2024, 10:13 AM MST |
Last Updated Apr 19, 10:15 AM MST

“Bridgerton” is an incredibly popular regency romance show on Netflix, with the 3rd season releasing in less than a month. The show is well known for its blatant disregard of actual historical events and fashions; for example, Queen Charlotte is shown in wigs that have rotating parts inside of them, something that was simply not possible nor in fashion at the time. Some people call “Bridgerton” “anti-historical” or “revisionist.” 

Does this new take on history erase colonization, Black narratives, and social class? The mixed-race casting is explained away in the first season by a random fictitious treaty that caused peace between races. Shortly after, viewers are introduced to the love interest for the first season, a Black man played by Regé-Jean Page. There is little focus on the potential issues that Black people faced during the Regency era. 

Similarly, in the second season, the main love interest is Indian, fluent in Hindi, and has an accent. She wears henna on her wedding day, as well as Indian-inspired Regency gowns, with shawls similar to sarees in a lot of her outfits. The colonization of India had long-lasting consequences, with lots of tension, wars, and some failed revolutions. Yet “Bridgerton,” like actual historical Britian, seemed to see it as an exotic and beautiful place, if not a bit crowded.  

The counterargument is that rather than being antihistorical, some believe those issues could have been or should be ignored or explained away to give people of color the opportunity to play parts that would otherwise always be played by white men and women. In other historical romances, especially those on television, the maids and manservants are sometimes people of color, or the narratives focus on the historical events of slavery and Black trauma. Regé-Jean Page told Entertainment Weekly he was excited to play a character that did not utilize those narratives to further the story. Instead, Page’s character, Simon, has an arc separate from his race, one focused on family expectations and the need for an heir in Regency England. 

Lady Danbury is another Black character, who raises Simon. She and her best friend, Lady Bridgerton are responsible for many romantic schemes to get couples together. It is incredibly refreshing to see a mixed-race female friendship on camera and had those historical inaccuracies or misrepresentations not happened, that beautiful friendship may not have been possible.  

“Bridgerton” has made it clear that they intend for this to be for a modern audience, with the colorful inaccurate dresses and pop-as-classical songs at the balls. Representing these positive stories and opening acting positions for people of color may be important, but is it worth the historical erasure? To quote Lady Whistledown, “Dearest gentle reader, that may be up to you to decide.” 

Tags: Bridgerton Netflix tv review
Amanda Hemmert Author More by Amanda Hemmert
Previous Arts & Culture Rachel Walton receives recognition for art exhibition 
Next Health & Wellness Let’s stay moving this Summer 
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Popular Reads

  • 1
    YouTube Thumbnail of Ava Ross candidate for Vice President of Academics
    “Put Horsepower in Academics” Ava Ross sits down with The UVU Review – A We Are Wolverines SpecialFebruary 26, 2026
  • 2
    A.I. lunch break teaches students and faculty how to use artificial intelligenceFebruary 19, 2026
  • 3
    Double doors leading to Student Leadership and Involvement Offices
    Proposed UVUSA constitutional amendment would add a third Connection and Belonging ChairFebruary 23, 2026
  • 4
    UVU Student Body Presidential Candidate Alex Stewart
    “All In for Alex” Alex Stewart sits down with The UVU Review – A We Are Wolverine Special EpisodeFebruary 23, 2026
  • 5
    UVU Presidential Candidate for Student Body President
    “Proud. Strong. True.” Cooper Despain sits down with The UVU Review – A We Are Wolverine Special EpisodeFebruary 23, 2026
UVU REVIEW

Sections

  • News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle

Games

  • Wordle
  • 2048
  • Sudoku
  • Flappy Bird
  • Tetris
  • Crossword

Shows

  • Wolverine Weekly
  • We are Wolverines
  • UVU Sports
  • The Cultured Wolverine
  • Wellness for Wolverines
  • Pro Talks

Company

  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • About Us
  • Staff Application

Follow Us

Your Privacy Choices Terms of Service Privacy Policy Disclaimer
UVU REVIEW

Sections

  • News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle

Games

  • Wordle
  • 2048
  • Sudoku
  • Flappy Bird
  • Tetris
  • Crossword

Shows

  • Wolverine Weekly
  • We are Wolverines
  • UVU Sports
  • The Cultured Wolverine

Company

  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • About Us
  • Staff Application
Your Privacy Choices Terms of Service Privacy Policy Disclaimer

2026 © The UVU Review 2026 | All Rights Reserved

© 2026 The UVU Review 2026 | All Rights Reserved

UVU REVIEW
Cookie Acknowledgement

The UVU Review uses cookies to improve site performance and analyze traffic. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies.

Ad Blockers and Incognito windows may affect some features.

For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and/or Terms and Conditions

 

Thank you for supporting Independent Student Journalism!

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
wpDiscuz