Skip to content
UVU REVIEW
Menu
  • Home
  • News
    • Campus Government
    • Events
    • Politics
    • Crime/Title IX
    • Business
  • Lifestyle
    • Health & Wellness
    • Valley Life
    • Wellness for Wolverines
    • Eating on Campus
    • Professors
    • Student Blog
  • Arts & Culture
    • Music
    • The Cultured Wolverine
  • Sports
    • Baseball
    • Basketball
      • Basketball
      • Basketball
    • Cross Country
      • Cross Country - Men's
      • Cross Country - Women's
    • Golf
      • Golf - Men's
      • Golf - Women's
    • Soccer
      • Soccer - Men's
      • Soccer - Women's
    • Track & Field
      • Track & Field - Men's
      • Track & Field - Women's
    • Wrestling
    • Wolverine Sports
  • Podcast
    • Wellness for Wolverines
    • The Cultured Wolverine
    • Wolverine Sports
    • Pro Talks
  • Youtube
    • Wolverine Weekly
    • We are Wolverines
    • Matchpoint
  • Games
    • Wordle
    • Crossword
    • Sudoku
    • Tetris
    • 2048
    • Flappy Bird

Search


About Us Advertise Contact Work For Us

Search UVU Review

About Us Advertise Contact Work For Us
SIGN UP LOG IN
Featured

Elder Dallin H. Oaks talks about the importance of religious freedom

By .
|
3 min read
Apr 19, 2014, 6:05 PM MST |
Last Updated Apr 19, 6:06 PM MST

Rinamay Rhoten, Staff Writer

Photo credit: Laura Fox

Elder Dallin H. Oaks, legal scholar and General Authority of the LDS church, addressed freedom of religion in a speech given on campus Wednesday. Not speaking as a religious figure, Oaks spoke on his expertise in freedom of religion and its importance.

Oaks began by saying that he did not want to focus on the technicalities and boundaries of the First Amendment. Instead, he decided to focus on Constitutional law and public safety.

“I believe we live in a time of diminishing freedom of speech—not the formal free-speech doctrine declared by the United States Supreme Court, but the extent of free speech enjoyed by citizens in their daily lives,” Oaks said

Oaks, who taught and practiced law in Chicago, mentioned the new laws that punish so-called hate speech. Scholars are no longer able to publish facts and opinions that are unpopular.

He argued that these impositions are unconstitutional and instead of bringing peace, they bring inequality and impose on the ideas of the nation.

Oaks cited Proposition 8 in California as an example. It was a time in America when freedom of speech and religion were put to the test. Although the proposition was in California, the entire nation was able to witness the controversial issue.

The New York Times reported, “Some of the violence is being stoked by public statements denouncing the LDS [Church] for merely participating in the debate at all—as if that were somehow illegal.”

Oaks continued, bringing up the corporate executive that was recently fired for making a private donation in the Proposition 8 campaign six years ago. Oaks called these acts nothing more than “bullying and intimidation that seeks to censor speech in the public square.”

The Constitution not only protects the freedom of religion but also the freedom of speech and “these great guarantees are cumulative, strengthening one another,” said Oaks.

Unfortunately, because some people have responded with violence and offensive behavior, these rights are challenged in today’s world as concerns are explored within discussions of peace and public safety.

“It is a daunting effort that might, perhaps, be avoided by following the ancient wisdom that it is easier to make friends than to make laws,” said Oaks.

Regarding Freedom of Religion, Oaks considered himself someone that has criticized court decisions, theories, and actions that are taking away Freedom of Religion in this country.

“One theory attempts to reduce the reach of the guarantee of the free exercise of religion by deeming it redundant in view of the assumed adequacy of the guarantee of free speech,” explained Oaks during his discourse.

In addition, there are new state and federal laws that the government is making which contradict civil rights. Oaks used same sex marriage to illustrate his point.

“I comment on this particular legal argument because of its relationship to free speech and because of its obvious importance to your Constitutional Symposium on Religious Freedom,” said Oaks.

Even though it’s a long battle, Oaks is optimistic about the future. He claims that freedom of religion would benefit not only religious people but all people as well.

“Leaders of various religious denominations—Catholic, Jewish, Muslim, Protestant and The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints—are coming together in unprecedented ways,” he said.

His last message was one of hope that people have a mutual respect towards one another, even if other people’s beliefs are different.

 

. More by .
Previous Featured Rich or poor: ‘All kids are our kids’
Next Featured UVU Theatre receives honor at National Theater Festival
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

2 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Cody Bair
Cody Bair
11 years ago

It is very odd that “Elder” Dallin Oaks, a General Authority of the LDS church and legal scholar, would even bring up proposition 8. The church’s tax exempt status should be in question after donating so much money to ban gay and lesbian couples from marriage. Which got overturned anyway. Obviously, god wanted them to get married. I think freedom of speech is expanding rather than diminishing. People can say whatever they’d like, but there are going to be consequences for what you say. If you are arguing for free speech, you have to argue for all free speech. No one is defending Don Imus for calling the Rutgers women’s basketball team “nappy headed hoes.” Also, for clarification, Brendon Eich the former CEO of Mozilla Firefox, stepped down, and wasn’t fired. I’m sure there was pressure on him to do so because progressive companies do not want to be associated with anti-LGBT…

0
Reply
Cody Bair
Cody Bair
11 years ago

I’m sure there was pressure on him to do so because progressive companies do not want to be associated with homophobic, anti-LGBT people. The company has the right if they wanted to fire him. Again, there a consequences for what you say.

0
Reply

Popular Reads

  • 1
    post game tartleton state UVU Wolverines
    PRE GAME SHOW MAR 5, 2026 | MATCH POINT | UVU REVIEWMarch 10, 2026
  • 2
    YouTube Thumbnail of Ava Ross candidate for Vice President of Academics
    “Put Horsepower in Academics” Ava Ross sits down with The UVU Review – A We Are Wolverines SpecialFebruary 26, 2026
  • 3
    Alfredo Medrano Candidate for UVU's Vice President of Academics
    “We’re All in it Together” Alfredo Medrano sits down with The UVU Review – A We Are Wolverines Special EpisodeFebruary 27, 2026
  • 4
    Thumbnail showing Timo Christensen Candidate for Vice President of Academics
    “A Place For You” Timo Christensen sits down with The UVU Review – We Are Wolverine Special EpisodeFebruary 27, 2026
  • 5
    Thumbnail with Sage Lloyd: Candidate for VP of Academics
    “I Want to be a Voice for You!” Sage Lloyd sits down with The UVU Review – A We Are Wolverines Special EpisodeFebruary 27, 2026
UVU REVIEW

Sections

  • News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle

Games

  • Wordle
  • 2048
  • Sudoku
  • Flappy Bird
  • Tetris
  • Crossword

Shows

  • Wolverine Weekly
  • We are Wolverines
  • UVU Sports
  • The Cultured Wolverine
  • Wellness for Wolverines
  • Pro Talks

Company

  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • About Us
  • Staff Application

Follow Us

Your Privacy Choices Terms of Service Privacy Policy Disclaimer
UVU REVIEW

Sections

  • News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle

Games

  • Wordle
  • 2048
  • Sudoku
  • Flappy Bird
  • Tetris
  • Crossword

Shows

  • Wolverine Weekly
  • We are Wolverines
  • UVU Sports
  • The Cultured Wolverine

Company

  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • About Us
  • Staff Application
Your Privacy Choices Terms of Service Privacy Policy Disclaimer

2026 © The UVU Review 2026 | All Rights Reserved

© 2026 The UVU Review 2026 | All Rights Reserved

UVU REVIEW
Cookie Acknowledgement

The UVU Review uses cookies to improve site performance and analyze traffic. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies.

Ad Blockers and Incognito windows may affect some features.

For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and/or Terms and Conditions

 

Thank you for supporting Independent Student Journalism!

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
wpDiscuz