Skip to content
UVU REVIEW
Menu
  • Home
  • News
    • Campus Government
    • Events
    • Politics
    • Crime/Title IX
    • Business
  • Lifestyle
    • Health & Wellness
    • Valley Life
    • Wellness for Wolverines
    • Eating on Campus
    • Professors
    • Student Blog
  • Arts & Culture
    • Music
    • The Cultured Wolverine
  • Sports
    • Baseball
    • Basketball
      • Basketball
      • Basketball
    • Cross Country
      • Cross Country - Men's
      • Cross Country - Women's
    • Golf
      • Golf - Men's
      • Golf - Women's
    • Soccer
      • Soccer - Men's
      • Soccer - Women's
    • Track & Field
      • Track & Field - Men's
      • Track & Field - Women's
    • Wrestling
    • Wolverine Sports
  • Podcast
    • Wellness for Wolverines
    • The Cultured Wolverine
    • Wolverine Sports
    • Pro Talks
  • Youtube
    • Wolverine Weekly
    • We are Wolverines
    • Matchpoint
  • Games
    • Wordle
    • Crossword
    • Sudoku
    • Tetris
    • 2048
    • Flappy Bird

Search


About Us Advertise Contact Work For Us

Search UVU Review

About Us Advertise Contact Work For Us
SIGN UP LOG IN
NOTICE The UVU Review has currently paused news production for the summer break until August 2026
Sports

College Football Playoff has proven beneficial, but it’s unfinished

By Brad Curnow
|
3 min read
Aug 29, 2016, 12:51 PM MST |
Last Updated Aug 29, 12:51 PM MST

Photo courtesy CBS Sports

Another college football season is upon us and similar to the expectation of the earth rotating around the sun, the Alabama Crimson Tide enter the season ranked as the No. 1 team in the land. Last season, Alabama’s defense dominated the College Football Playoff by shutting down the powerhouse Michigan State Spartans and slowing Heisman hopeful DeShaun Watson in the CFP National Championship Game. In short, the Crimson Tide truly earned their title through the CFP. Despite entering the season as heavy favorites, Alabama will need to finish strong again to repeat as champs because of the CFP.

The implementation of the CFP has made the college football season more interesting and forces the Tide to earn their title from year to year, rather than simply allowing them to bully their way through the Southeastern Conference, then receive a default bid into the National Championship Game. The CFP has allowed the rest of the field a chance to compete for a title and gives fans what they want at the end of the season: additional meaningful football games.

From the fan’s perspective, the CFP has been a huge success since its implementation two seasons ago. The first four teams to play in the CFP were the Florida State Seminoles, Oregon Ducks, Ohio State Buckeyes and Alabama. Given the history of the previous Bowl Championship Series format, Alabama and FSU would have been given bids into the BCS title game, while Oregon and OSU were left to play on New Year’s Eve for a semi-meaningless trophy in a bowl game watched only by those of us who stay home to watch football that night rather than attend parties. However, the beauty of the CFP is that both Oregon and OSU were given the opportunity to compete and beat the favorites, handily at that, and met for an unexpected clash in the first-ever CFP National Championship.

Another thing the CFP does for college football is give extra life to teams after a loss. Proponents of the BCS system claimed it made for a season-long playoff, rather than just having a single playoff at the end of the season. The CFP continues to allow for late-season eliminations, while also creating dramatic races at the end of the season when as many as six teams may be competing for the final four spots. Last season, the Stanford Cardinal and Notre Dame Fighting Irish had resumes worthy of CFP bids, but were left out at the expense of berths for the Oklahoma Sooners, Clemson Tigers, Michigan State Spartans and, eventual champ, Alabama.

The CFP has helped college football to build a season that keeps fans interested longer and is more enjoyable and competitive. The only problem with the current arrangement of the CFP? It doesn’t have enough teams. A four-team playoff leaves out one power 5 school, even expansion to eight teams allows for all power conferences to have representation along with several wild cards. Open the playoff up to eight teams and let chaos ensue. The inaugural CFP showed us that, similar to the NCAA Basketball Tournament, anybody can win a one-game playoff. So why not let Cinderella play football, too?

Tags: College football playoff
Brad Curnow More by Brad Curnow
Previous Sports National concession progression and UVU
Next Opinions Jesse Ruins Fall Semester: Why I loathe fall semester
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted

Popular Reads

  • 1
    Utah Valley University seal in front of the Keller building with chalk writing in memory of Charlie Kirk | Photo by: Matthew Franke, The UVU Review
    UVU 2026 commencement to be without keynote speakerApril 18, 2026
  • 2
    Wolverine Weekly Season 2 | Episode 4 See you next Semester!April 18, 2026
  • 3
    How to Become the Candidate Recruiters Look ForApril 20, 2026
  • 4
    The UVU Review announces leadership transition, pauses production for semester closeApril 20, 2026
UVU REVIEW

Sections

  • News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle

Games

  • Wordle
  • 2048
  • Sudoku
  • Flappy Bird
  • Tetris
  • Crossword

Shows

  • Wolverine Weekly
  • We are Wolverines
  • UVU Sports
  • The Cultured Wolverine
  • Wellness for Wolverines
  • Pro Talks

Company

  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • About Us
  • Staff Application

Follow Us

Your Privacy Choices Terms of Service Privacy Policy Disclaimer
UVU REVIEW

Sections

  • News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle

Games

  • Wordle
  • 2048
  • Sudoku
  • Flappy Bird
  • Tetris
  • Crossword

Shows

  • Wolverine Weekly
  • We are Wolverines
  • UVU Sports
  • The Cultured Wolverine

Company

  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • About Us
  • Staff Application
Your Privacy Choices Terms of Service Privacy Policy Disclaimer

2026 © The UVU Review 2026 | All Rights Reserved

© 2026 The UVU Review 2026 | All Rights Reserved

UVU REVIEW
Cookie Acknowledgement

The UVU Review uses cookies to improve site performance and analyze traffic. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies.

Ad Blockers and Incognito windows may affect some features.

For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and/or Terms and Conditions

 

Thank you for supporting Independent Student Journalism!

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
wpDiscuz