Skip to content
UVU REVIEW
Menu
  • Home
  • News
    • Campus Government
    • Events
    • Politics
    • Crime/Title IX
    • Business
  • Lifestyle
    • Health & Wellness
    • Valley Life
    • Wellness for Wolverines
    • Eating on Campus
    • Professors
    • Student Blog
  • Arts & Culture
    • Music
    • The Cultured Wolverine
  • Sports
    • Baseball
    • Basketball
      • Basketball
      • Basketball
    • Cross Country
      • Cross Country - Men's
      • Cross Country - Women's
    • Golf
      • Golf - Men's
      • Golf - Women's
    • Soccer
      • Soccer - Men's
      • Soccer - Women's
    • Track & Field
      • Track & Field - Men's
      • Track & Field - Women's
    • Wrestling
    • Wolverine Sports
  • Podcast
    • Wellness for Wolverines
    • The Cultured Wolverine
    • Wolverine Sports
    • Pro Talks
  • Youtube
    • Wolverine Weekly
    • We are Wolverines
    • Matchpoint
  • Games
    • Wordle
    • Crossword
    • Sudoku
    • Tetris
    • 2048
    • Flappy Bird

Search


About Us Advertise Contact Work For Us

Search UVU Review

About Us Advertise Contact Work For Us
SIGN UP LOG IN
News

UVU develops innovative nuclear technology

By KresLynn Knouse
|
3 min read
Feb 4, 2014, 6:14 PM MST |
Last Updated Feb 4, 6:17 PM MST

UVU’s office of Technology Commercialization is currently in the process of developing a unique model of a nuclear reactor known as the molten salt reactor, or MSR. MSRs have the ability to recycle the 270,000 metric tons of toxic waste generated from traditional light water reactors into a substantial power supply.

MSR development has received increased attention from countries such as China, India, Australia, and Japan due to the efficiency, safety and ‘eco-friendly’ features of the system.

MSR design innovators have boasted the potential to boost economies of third-world countries, recycle toxic waste to create energy, and generate a much larger amount of electricity without the tradeoff of constructing a larger-sized reactor.

“We are in the process of obtaining the necessary capital to develop prototypes to prove that our design works,” Kent Millington, technology commercialization director, said. “We know the concept of molten salt reactors works because they were efficient during testing in the 1960s, but the technology was mothballed because the product was not upgradeable to weapons-grade material.”

The idea was brought to UVU by inventor and entrepreneur Sheldon Hansen, creator of the Wolverine Dutch Oven. Technology commercialization offices at UVU and the University of Utah have joined forces to improve designs and functioning of the reactor.

“Working with the TCOs at UVU and the U of U has been great, for it’s truly a technological collaboration,” Hansen said in a press release. “I have been so impressed with UVU’s personal, aggressive approach in taking technologies from incubation to commercialization. It’s not just collaboration. It’s acceleration.”

In the past, there has been hesitancy to develop nuclear reactor technology due to public concerns with potential meltdowns and the projected cost of operating a nuclear reactor. However, MSRs are not susceptible to the tragic meltdowns as seen in Fukushima and Three Mile Island and are generally inexpensive to operate.

MSRs operate by dissolving a nuclear fuel—in this case, Thorium, an abundant substance as common as lead—into molten fluoride salt. Both Thorium and Uranium are dissolved into the molten salt, creating a reaction that can generate enough energy to provide enough electricity to supply an entire country using minute amounts of both elements.

“Although there are many competitors in the race to mass-produce these reactors, UVU’s design has some unique and important advantages over the rest of the competition,” Millington said.

Those advantages could revolutionize the way the world looks at energy production, if all goes as planned once the project achieves the desired funding. Though there are many types of molten salt reactors, UVU’s design offers a unique compatibility that may draw the attention of outside investors.

Millington estimates that five eight-foot-cubed MSRs could generate all of the electricity currently used by the state of Utah.

Molten salt reactors, like all sources of energy production, are subject to drawbacks. Possible metal buildup over time is a concern as well as managing the leftover recycled radioactive waste that is produced by the MSRs. Development of MSRs has also been halted, meaning there will be a lengthy testing phase before any can be produced.

While scholars continue to research efficient and eco-friendly alternatives to energy production, UVU has officially joined the race in developing this kind of revolutionary technology.

MSR1

KresLynn Knouse More by KresLynn Knouse
Previous News Haze at Capitol Hill
Next Featured The blackfish debate
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

10 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Paul King
Paul King
12 years ago

When something sounds to good to be true, it usually is. As someone living in the shadow of an old conventional nuclear plant, I hope this is true.

0
Reply
Leading Edge Boomer
Leading Edge Boomer
12 years ago

Both molten salt technology and thorium-based nuclear reactors are well-researched, but they are not tied to each other, and I’ll comment only on the latter. Thorium is the real deal. One can find extensive articles on the Web about the manifold advantages of thorium over uranium/plutonium reactors. The list is long.

The primary “disadvantage” of using thorium is that nuclear weapons cannot be made from it. At the beginning of the nuclear age, the entire supply chain (mining, refining, milling, enrichment, etc.) was built around making as many nuclear and hydrogen bombs as possible; the whole “atoms for peace” meme was just a ruse. This supply chain would have to be replaced to take advantage of thorium’s potential.

A little-recognized advantage of thorium is its natural occurrence with rare-earth metals, needed in almost every electronic component, that are now almost…

0
Reply
Bill Dempster
Bill Dempster
12 years ago

Paul King –
I can well understand your comment, but wish to reply that there is a substantial body of knowledge and many reputable scientists / engineers who agree that MSR technology is just what is described by this article. For further reading, I suggest article in American Scientist, v. 98, July / Aug 2010 by Robert Hargraves and Ralph Moir titled Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactors. Also books : Superfuel by Richard Martin (very readable) and Thorium – Energy Cheaper Than Coal by Robert Hargraves (technical and more difficult). Both the Hargraves article and book are of the level and quality to address the important questions that may come from serious scientific and engineering inquiries, especially when coupled with the fact that an MSR successfully operated from 1965 – 1969 at Oak Ridge under direction of Alvin Weinberg.
This all begs the question “if its so good, why isn’t it…

0
Reply
luigi tasselli
luigi tasselli
12 years ago

I think that a major problem scientists will face will be the harsh environment in the facility where fission products will be continuosly separated. So I think a large use of automata will be necessary. Are times mature?

0
Reply
Robin Gould
Robin Gould
12 years ago

A far more important consideration than any debate about the adoption of MSR technology (or not), is our urgent need to start phasing out the reliance we have all had upon the burning of fossil fuels since the start of the industrial revolution. The evidence for action is the growing severity of exaggerated climate patterns and the need, is to help our planet recover from the countless tons of pollution we give it every minute of the day.

MSR plant size does not have to be big to make a difference, as the Oak Ridge reactor only produced 8MW. Thousands of smaller plants powering airports, supermarkets, office blocks, universities, ships, towns and villages around the world will do the same job as a few 1000MW plants. The opportunity for the astute investor with a billion to spare is enormous – offers welcome.

0
Reply
View Replies (2)
Charles Hart
Charles Hart
12 years ago

For more info on this technology see:

http://energyfromthorium.com/

0
Reply
View Replies (1)
KitemanSA
KitemanSA
12 years ago

Nice Graphic!

0
Reply

Popular Reads

  • 1
    The Utah State Capital on a clear blue day.
    Will Utah’s new congressional map affect UVU?March 16, 2026
  • 2
    The UVU Review announces leadership transition, pauses production for semester closeApril 20, 2026
  • 3
    How to Become the Candidate Recruiters Look ForApril 20, 2026
  • 4
    Wolverine Weekly Season 2 | Episode 4 See you next Semester!April 18, 2026
  • 5
    Utah Valley University seal in front of the Keller building with chalk writing in memory of Charlie Kirk | Photo by: Matthew Franke, The UVU Review
    UVU 2026 commencement to be without keynote speakerApril 18, 2026
UVU REVIEW

Sections

  • News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle

Games

  • Wordle
  • 2048
  • Sudoku
  • Flappy Bird
  • Tetris
  • Crossword

Shows

  • Wolverine Weekly
  • We are Wolverines
  • UVU Sports
  • The Cultured Wolverine
  • Wellness for Wolverines
  • Pro Talks

Company

  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • About Us
  • Staff Application

Follow Us

Your Privacy Choices Terms of Service Privacy Policy Disclaimer
UVU REVIEW

Sections

  • News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle

Games

  • Wordle
  • 2048
  • Sudoku
  • Flappy Bird
  • Tetris
  • Crossword

Shows

  • Wolverine Weekly
  • We are Wolverines
  • UVU Sports
  • The Cultured Wolverine

Company

  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • About Us
  • Staff Application
Your Privacy Choices Terms of Service Privacy Policy Disclaimer

2026 © The UVU Review 2026 | All Rights Reserved

© 2026 The UVU Review 2026 | All Rights Reserved

UVU REVIEW
Cookie Acknowledgement

The UVU Review uses cookies to improve site performance and analyze traffic. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies.

Ad Blockers and Incognito windows may affect some features.

For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and/or Terms and Conditions

 

Thank you for supporting Independent Student Journalism!

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
wpDiscuz