Skip to content
UVU REVIEW
Menu
  • Home
  • News
    • Campus Government
    • Events
    • Politics
    • Crime/Title IX
    • Business
  • Lifestyle
    • Health & Wellness
    • Valley Life
    • Wellness for Wolverines
    • Eating on Campus
    • Professors
    • Student Blog
  • Arts & Culture
    • Music
    • The Cultured Wolverine
  • Sports
    • Baseball
    • Basketball
      • Basketball
      • Basketball
    • Cross Country
      • Cross Country - Men's
      • Cross Country - Women's
    • Golf
      • Golf - Men's
      • Golf - Women's
    • Soccer
      • Soccer - Men's
      • Soccer - Women's
    • Track & Field
      • Track & Field - Men's
      • Track & Field - Women's
    • Wrestling
    • Wolverine Sports
  • Podcast
    • Wellness for Wolverines
    • The Cultured Wolverine
    • Wolverine Sports
    • Pro Talks
  • Youtube
    • Wolverine Weekly
    • We are Wolverines
    • Matchpoint
  • Games
    • Wordle
    • Crossword
    • Sudoku
    • Tetris
    • 2048
    • Flappy Bird

Search


About Us Advertise Contact Work For Us

Search UVU Review

About Us Advertise Contact Work For Us
SIGN UP LOG IN
NOTICE The UVU Review has currently paused news production for the summer break until August 2026
Breaking

Rally at State Capitol for Utah Lake

By Katelyn Hickman
|
4 min read
Conserve Utah Valley held a rally on Feb. 7 at the Utah State Capitol for locals to express their concerns about new legislation affecting Utah Lake. Photo by Kate Hickman.
Feb 8, 2022, 4:57 PM MST |
Last Updated Feb 8, 4:57 PM MST

Conserve Utah Valley held a rally on Feb. 7 at the Utah State Capitol for locals to express their concerns about new legislation affecting Utah Lake. According to organizers, around 560 people were in attendance. 

The rally was intended to educate residents about the events surrounding Utah Lake and inspire them to contact their representatives to express their opinions and concerns. According to @conserveutahvalley, the program began with a Peyote Water Drum blessing before attendees heard from Dr. Ben Abbott, an aquatic ecologist, and an advocate for conserving Utah Lake. 

Mary Murdock Meyer, chief executive of the Timpanogos Nation, then spoke about the historical significance of Utah Lake to indigenous peoples who inhabited the area before the arrival of European settlers. “It is sacred, and it is also historic,” she stated. “This lake meant survival for our people, as well as for the pioneers when they came.”

Following Meyer’s remarks, Craig Christensen, executive director of CUV, thanked attendees for their dedication to Utah Lake. He expressed CUV’s goals relative to the Lake and implored advocates to contact their representatives. 

An objective of the rally was to draw attention to new legislation concerning Utah Lake during the 2022 General Legislative Session. According to Adam Johnson, executive assistant director of CUV and a student of law at Brigham Young University, the bills in question are commonly referred to as the “Utah Lake Authority” and “Utah Lake Amendments”: House Bill 232 and House Bill 240, respectively.

A headcount at 5:40 reported 563 people in attendance at the rally. Photo by Kate Hickman.

Several state representatives then spoke to the audience about their goals for Utah Lake: these included Rep. Nelson Abbott, R-Orem, Sen. Curtis Bramble, R-Provo and Rep. Keven Stratton, R-Orem. Reviewing the practical implications about the island proposal from Lake Restoration Solutions from a political perspective, Rep. Abbott asked, “Is it even a practical plan?” 

Rep. Abbott went on to stress the importance of finding a strategy that keeps in mind the best, long-term interests of Utah Valley locals. 

Bramble commented on the significant turnout of the rally, stating, “This is a robust debate in the public square.” He stressed the importance of these types of dialogues when it comes to legislative decisions and the influence of public comment. 

Stratton further encouraged civic engagement by noting, “If you don’t like a proposal, it is your god-given right to speak out.” He expressed a dream, looking seven generations in the future–a cultural practice of the Timpanogos Nation shared by Meyer–his posterity would experience the Lake like his ancestors did. “This is a long-term process,” stated Stratton.

Christensen concluded the rally by sharing the opportunities individuals have to take action and express their opinions about Utah Lake. Christensen suggested obtaining and displaying a “Don’t Pave Utah Lake” sign, and donating to Dr. Abbott’s legal defense fund in response to a lawsuit by LRS. Finally, he encouraged advocates to sign the petition to repeal H.B. 272, which has already exceeded 6,000 signatures. 

“If you think it’s over, we’re just getting started,” said Christensen. 

The LRS proposal has been submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to review for the permitting process; the proposal is now temporarily available for public comment. They are “particularly interested in receiving comments related to the proposal’s probable impacts on the affected aquatic environment and the secondary and cumulative effects,” according to the website. 

“It’s really horrifying to see private developers use ‘restoration’ to destroy ecosystems,” said Valerie Martin, a Ph.D. student studying ecology at Utah State University. “There’s a whole field dedicated to restoration ecology, and this is not that.”

LRS was contacted to comment on the ongoing dialogue but hasn’t responded to The Review’s request. 

For more information about the history of Utah Lake and the developments that have led to the current legislation and proposal, see this article. To learn more about the island proposal, visit the LRS website. To learn more about Utah Lake advocacy, see opportunities provided by CUV.

Tags: 2022 General Legislative Session Ben Abbott brigham young university Conserve Utah Valley Craig Christensen Curtis Bramble Don't Pave Utah Lake HB 232 HB 240 Keven Stratton Lake Restoration Solutions Mary Murdock Meyer Nelson Abbott Timpanogos Nation US Army Corps of Engineers Utah Lake Utah State University Valerie Martin
Katelyn Hickman More by Katelyn Hickman
Previous Basketball - Men's Wolverines host GCU and NMSU in critical battle for WAC seeding
Next Events A headbanging newsbeat
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
UVU REVIEW

Sections

  • News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle

Games

  • Wordle
  • 2048
  • Sudoku
  • Flappy Bird
  • Tetris
  • Crossword

Shows

  • Wolverine Weekly
  • We are Wolverines
  • UVU Sports
  • The Cultured Wolverine
  • Wellness for Wolverines
  • Pro Talks

Company

  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • About Us
  • Staff Application

Follow Us

Your Privacy Choices Terms of Service Privacy Policy Disclaimer
UVU REVIEW

Sections

  • News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle

Games

  • Wordle
  • 2048
  • Sudoku
  • Flappy Bird
  • Tetris
  • Crossword

Shows

  • Wolverine Weekly
  • We are Wolverines
  • UVU Sports
  • The Cultured Wolverine

Company

  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • About Us
  • Staff Application
Your Privacy Choices Terms of Service Privacy Policy Disclaimer

2026 © The UVU Review 2026 | All Rights Reserved

© 2026 The UVU Review 2026 | All Rights Reserved

UVU REVIEW
Cookie Acknowledgement

The UVU Review uses cookies to improve site performance and analyze traffic. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies.

Ad Blockers and Incognito windows may affect some features.

For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and/or Terms and Conditions

 

Thank you for supporting Independent Student Journalism!

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
wpDiscuz