Skip to content
UVU REVIEW
Menu
  • Home
  • News
    • Campus Government
    • Events
    • Politics
    • Crime/Title IX
    • Business
  • Lifestyle
    • Health & Wellness
    • Valley Life
    • Wellness for Wolverines
    • Eating on Campus
    • Professors
    • Student Blog
  • Arts & Culture
    • Music
    • The Cultured Wolverine
  • Sports
    • Baseball
    • Basketball
      • Basketball
      • Basketball
    • Cross Country
      • Cross Country - Men's
      • Cross Country - Women's
    • Golf
      • Golf - Men's
      • Golf - Women's
    • Soccer
      • Soccer - Men's
      • Soccer - Women's
    • Track & Field
      • Track & Field - Men's
      • Track & Field - Women's
    • Wrestling
    • Wolverine Sports
  • Podcast
    • Wellness for Wolverines
    • The Cultured Wolverine
    • Wolverine Sports
    • Pro Talks
  • Youtube
    • Wolverine Weekly
    • We are Wolverines
    • Matchpoint
  • Games
    • Wordle
    • Crossword
    • Sudoku
    • Tetris
    • 2048
    • Flappy Bird

Search


About Us Advertise Contact Work For Us

Search UVU Review

About Us Advertise Contact Work For Us
SIGN UP LOG IN
News

Professor uses election forecast model to predict presidential election

By Alan Ledesma
|
3 min read
Oct 10, 2016, 12:28 PM MST |
Last Updated Oct 10, 12:28 PM MST

Photo by Collin Cooper

This year’s presidential election winner will be Hillary Clinton, according to an election forecast model presented by Jay DeSart, associate professor of political science at UVU.

According to DeSart’s forecast, Clinton has a 90.3 percent probability of winning the Electoral College vote. The DeSart-Holbrok election forecast model was developed by DeSart and Thomas Holbrok, professor of government at University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. DeSart’s model has accurately predicted the outcome of every election since 2004.

DeSart presented his election forecast model during an hour-long presentation Oct. 3 at the UVU library.

DeSart first published his forecasting model in 1999 in the International Journal of Forecasting. DeSart then put his forecasting model to the test during the 2000 election, but his model failed.

DeSart said that no one could predict the Florida vote recount and the ballot issues that ultimately tilted the election the other way. However, his model accurately predicted Al Gore winning the popular vote in the 2000 election.

“My bias isn’t an ideological one, my bias is towards being right. I’m doing this purely as an academic exercise. Can we predict the outcome? I don’t cherry-pick the polls, I look at all the polls,” DeSart said.

DeSart generates his forecasting model by predicting elections at the state level. He analyzes polls from all 50 states and the District of Columbia and then extends the application to a national level. After figuring out which candidate is going to win a state, DeSart then applies the electoral vote to each of those winners.

Finally, he tallies the numbers to determine which candidate gets to 270 electoral votes, which is the number of votes needed to win the election.

“It’s what happens in the states that actually matters, and so that’s why we focused our efforts on state-level predictions,” DeSart said.

DeSart predicts that Clinton will receive 326 electoral votes, and the Republican nominee, Donald Trump, will receive 212 electoral votes.

“This is my first time hearing about an election forecast. I just barely turned 18 so elections are pretty new to me. I feel like it has a lot of potential to be correct, but we don’t know all the circumstances. We don’t know what’s going to happen between now and the actual election, but it’s a pretty safe bet,” said Janie DeFriez, a student at UVU.

Britton Jensen, a junior at UVU said,“I still have hope and faith that Donald Trump will be the winner. It will be a great upset most likely if he does win, but if he doesn’t it will be something that was worth fighting for.”

Clinton could lose some of the key battleground states like Ohio and still win the election, DeSart said. Clinton has a pretty nice cushion, according to DeSart’s forecasting model, which is bad news for Trump supporters.

Alan Ledesma More by Alan Ledesma
Previous Sports When the moment is bigger than the game
Next Opinions Get out and vote
0 0 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Login
Notify of
guest

guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

0 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
UVU REVIEW

Sections

  • News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle

Games

  • Wordle
  • 2048
  • Sudoku
  • Flappy Bird
  • Tetris
  • Crossword

Shows

  • Wolverine Weekly
  • We are Wolverines
  • UVU Sports
  • The Cultured Wolverine
  • Wellness for Wolverines
  • Pro Talks

Company

  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • About Us
  • Staff Application

Follow Us

Your Privacy Choices Terms of Service Privacy Policy Disclaimer
UVU REVIEW

Sections

  • News
  • Arts & Culture
  • Sports
  • Lifestyle

Games

  • Wordle
  • 2048
  • Sudoku
  • Flappy Bird
  • Tetris
  • Crossword

Shows

  • Wolverine Weekly
  • We are Wolverines
  • UVU Sports
  • The Cultured Wolverine

Company

  • Contact Us
  • Advertising
  • About Us
  • Staff Application
Your Privacy Choices Terms of Service Privacy Policy Disclaimer

2026 © The UVU Review 2026 | All Rights Reserved

© 2026 The UVU Review 2026 | All Rights Reserved

UVU REVIEW
Cookie Acknowledgement

The UVU Review uses cookies to improve site performance and analyze traffic. By continuing, you agree to our use of cookies.

Ad Blockers and Incognito windows may affect some features.

For more information, please see our Privacy Policy and/or Terms and Conditions

 

Thank you for supporting Independent Student Journalism!

Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
  • Manage options
  • Manage services
  • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
  • Read more about these purposes
View preferences
  • {title}
  • {title}
  • {title}
wpDiscuz