…And i’m a Democrat

…And i’m a Democrat
7 comments, Sunday, November 4th, 2012, by Cameron Simek, in Featured, Opinions
by Nick Boyer
Have you been to the Provo Towne Center Mall? I have.

Growing up, my parents always took me to all the malls. I used to think the only reason anyone would go to Park City was for the outlet mall. I know all of the malls. City Creek is pretty cool. I still prefer Gateway.

I’m getting sidetracked.

I mention my background because I know malls. And the Provo Towne Center Mall is pretty much the same as any other mall, except for one thing—the Jon McNaughton gallery store. If you’re not able to Google what it is right now, I’ll fill you in.

Jon McNaughton is a painter, a political activist, a conservative and a Mormon. But you won’t see him on those Mormon commercials. You don’t know what those are either? Man, you need to get out more. They’re commercials that feature interesting versions of what it means to be a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and they end with “And I’m a Mormon.”

Okay, you have seen those. Sorry. Back to McNaughton. His spiritual paintings are mostly average LDS-themed stuff. But he is more famous for his political paintings.

Excuse me, I will, again have to bring you up to speed on this. McNaughton painted Christ’s second coming, holding the Constitution as a holy document with the founding fathers and the liberal stereotypes being represented in a condemning light.

Not up to speed yet? How about this: McNaughton painted President Obama burning the Constitution in his piece titled “One Nation Under Socialism” and another one of President Obama stepping on the Constitution in front of all the past presidents. Or how about . . . actually, I’m going to stop there.

McNaughton’s gallery is prominently featured in the Provo Towne Center Mall, which is fine, but doesn’t that just give you an idea of what kind of county we live in? McNaughton, it seems, really doesn’t believe in a separation from church and state, as long as it is his religion. And I don’t mean the LDS religion, I mean his own interpretation of what is right and wrong. Because to him, being a leftist is wrong and being on the right is righteousness.

I’m going to take pause and share with you that my father-in-law is probably the most committed, active Mormon I know. He works right smack dab in the Church Headquarters building in the center of Salt Lake City. He devotes his time, effort, energy and dime to the cause of Mormonism, oh and he’s a Democrat.

Note to self: new marketing idea for Democrats using the “And I’m a Democrat” after saying other descriptive things about person. It is definitely a minority in the LDS church, but there are many who are both Mormon and Democrat.

McNaughton is a very successful painter. It reminds me of hearing Creed or Nickleback and thinking “Who listens to this?” but it turns out a lot of people do. So, the art being successful really represents the people who buy it. Being in the mall is pretty mainstream. Sometimes, I can’t even get my art into a local farmer’s market.

I do want to point out that McNaughton’s work used to be featured in the BYU bookstore but then they got rid of it because it was too political. This same mall that has McNaughton’s gallery has a store called Hot Topic which tries to sell teenage angst and rebelliousness to impressionable teenagers. I really hope McNaughton’s work doesn’t catch on like Hot Topic has, mostly because I think it is a bad influence for impressionable Mormons or Conservatives that want to showcase some rank, poor taste propaganda.

I can imagine someone buying it and then hanging it on the wall with some of that teenage angst and rebelliousness seen at Hot Topic. It is ironic to me because if you really don’t like President Obama, would you want a painting of him on your wall? Granted it isn’t in the best light of him, but that just reminds me of a little kid in elementary school drawing one of his friends with a stick figure body and writing “stupidhead” with an arrow pointing to it.

With this election coming up, I hope people aren’t this childish and silly. You will hear it every election cycle that this election is the most important ever, which is true until the next election cycle. It is imperative for people to participate and to know the issues.

While having the information machine called the Internet at hand, there are more voices making the information hard to dissect and digest. It is becoming white noise, which is another name I use for Fox News. The 24 hour news cycle gives sensationalistic slants on stories to get more viewership while overlooking the issues that really matter.

Remember when Fox News said President Obama was giving Michelle Obama a terrorist fist jab in 2008? Or whenever CNN showcases some odd new technology that is just more distracting than illuminating, like the hologram reporter or masking of Paul Ryan’s face with some reflectors to see which facial muscles he was using during the debate? It is because of this sensationalism (desperation) that people like Glenn Beck and Sean Hannity are millionaires.

The drama of showing one side being completely villainous and conspiratorially corrupting America is very moving, until you don’t give them the benefit of the doubt and research it online meticulously with real sources. But who has the time?

It’s much funner to let some pundit trounce you for an hour with pure drama, like a puppet show (Glenn Beck literally did that once). MSNBC also participates in a not-so-subtle narrative with their leading liberals like Rachel Maddow and Ed Schultz. The white noise is hard to navigate through. Have you looked over the issues? I know its fun to watch the debate and feel like you’re watching Wrestlemania again, but, don’t fall into that crowd of endless Jerry Springer mob-like stupidity. Because the issues do matter.

Often when I discuss politics, it becomes apparent that the person either is completely devoted or feels complete apathy because it doesn’t seem like it changes their lives that much. Unlike in sports, it matters a great deal who wins and loses. It matters to immigrants what happens to them if they’re undocumented and the next president takes an iron fist rule on deportation. It matters to the kid going to school and needing a pell grant. Or the small business owner if they’ll have higher taxes. Or the person fighting with their healthcare insurance agent on coverage for a deathly illness. Or the veteran that needs help adjusting to being a civilian. Or the impoverished family that relies on food stamps, schools and low paying jobs to keep afloat. Or the billionaire that doesn’t want to see his taxes go up. I do care because these issues affect so many lives in a big way.

But, what side of the McNaughton painting would you fall into? For me, the Obama administration has done everything they can to live up to the high expectations of Hope and Change. Except when it comes to civil liberty issues like the Patriot Act, closing Guantanamo Bay or the drone attacks on villages. Ron Paul fans can attest to that.

Economically, they have spent money. You’ll hear the Republicans repeat this many times. The difference though is that when Democrats spend money, it is for investing in Americans with programs like Social Security, or an automobile industry bailout that kept that market from falling like so many other companies in 2009 with the recession, or Medicare, Medicaid, Pell grants, social safety nets in general, NASA, public broadcasting, veterans with GI Bills and scholarships, health care like Planned Parenthood, which helps people finance their check ups and birth control, public education (lots of kids need those teachers to keep their jobs), stimulus packages which kept more jobs from being lost (which a lot of Republican politicians accepted and used to help their local economies) and infrastructure projects which also employs.

When Republicans spend money, from Reagan on, it has been on military expansions and wars. Now, I know both sides have spent money on these things, but only one side makes cutting public service programs a zealous religious issue of the utmost importance in their rhetoric and policies, and it isn’t the Democrats.

So, primarily, I support the Democratic policies because I believe the government’s role economically should be making sure everyone has a chance by investing in the country and the citizens, which helps grow opportunity and wealth for everyone, because income inequality affects everyone. And I’m a Mormon.

About Cameron Simek

7 comments

  1. MrNirom
    November 5th, 2012 0:34

    Like most socialist, they love it when the government takes care of everything for them. But how does all this stuff get paid for? If you keep spending… the only way the government can afford what they spend is by collecting what they spend from the people. They have no other source of income. Why not just tell the people that they are to go to work every day, and the government will collect their paycheck.. and then in return, give them a place to live,food to eat, and birth control pills to keep from getting pregnant. Of course, because the people won’t have any money to play with, there won’t be much need for businesses anymore to provide goods and services as the government provides all that. Oh yea.. sign me up. And as long as the government is providing all my needs.. they can elect the person in charge for me because it really won’t matter anymore.

    Reply

  2. MrNirom
    November 5th, 2012 0:51

    Separation of church and state.

    I am surprised at how many people do not understand what the separation of church and state really means. Talking about God or reading from the Bible or Book of Mormon in public places or having a picture of Obama burning the Constitution in a public mall has nothing to do with separation of church and state (SCS). SCS has everything to do with the state giving directions concerning religion. i.e. What you must believe. Government provides freedom OF religion.. not freedom FROM religion. Its OK to say prayers in schools, or in public places. But the state can not tell us what prayers will or will not be said. There can be no State religion that all must follow. That is what is meant by SCS… not this crazy notion that nothing religious can be displayed or talked about in public places or on government property.

    Reply

  3. Jeff Cunningham
    November 5th, 2012 23:16

    I’ve felt for a long time that both parties believe in welfare- Democrats, to individuals and Republicans, to corporations. Oh, wait a minute, corporations are people too right?

    Reply

  4. November 7th, 2012 9:33

    Cameron,
    Your review of my work and your positions regarding Democrats and the church are very typical of liberal church members I’ve met. Why do you think most members of the church are Conservative? How do you justify a party that supports abortion and gay rights when these are against the official positions of the church?

    Your writing was not accurate regarding my paintings. I could see that you didn’t even take a second to learn the background behind what I do. My painting of One Nation Under God has no connection to the Second Coming and my work was not booted from the BYU Bookstore. (I pulled my work myself after dealing with a couple of dishonest people.) The country is very divided and I receive both supportive and angry responses to my work, but the most angry letters always come from liberal LDS people. You are on the wrong side of the fence brother.

    Reply

  5. Concerned Spectator
    November 8th, 2012 15:40

    Wow Jon, you really got offended at something written in a UVU newspaper. Your comments lacked the most important part of your religion, which is love. So relax. Your angry comments aren’t helping bring people together, which is the antithesis of your religion.

    Reply

  6. Anna
    November 15th, 2012 10:46

    If I’m a socialist, than Mr. McNaughton is a fascist.

    Reply

  7. Natanne
    November 16th, 2012 10:43

    According to Deseret News, the BYU bookstore is supposed to feature politically neutral artwork in accordance with school policy – and whatever else is said, Jon McNaughton is defined by the lack of political neutrality in some of his artwork.
    The bookstore did in fact stop selling Jon McNaughton’s painting “One Nation Under God” after an art professor called it a propaganda piece for the Tea Party, and he subsequently removed all of his artwork from the bookstore.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>